Ramesh Babu v. Commissioner Of Central Excise And Customs Belapur Commissionerate And ANR

21&22-NMA.1127.2016+.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1127 OF 2016 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 95 OF 2016 LSR Speciality Oil Pvt. Ltd.

} Applicant versus Commissioner of Central } Excise and Customs } Respondent NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1134 OF 2016 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 96 OF 2016 Ramesh Babu } Applicant versus Commissioner of Central } Excise and Customs } Respondent Mr. Nikhil Rungta with Mr. Ramnath Prabhu and Mr. Prabhakar Shetty for the applicants.

Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly for the respondent.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.

DATED :- OCTOBER 10, 2016 P.C. :- 1.

Heard both sides. For the reasons set out in the affidavit in support, the notices of motion are made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). There would be no order as to costs. (B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) J.V.Salunke,PA