The Pr. Commissioner Of Cgst And Central Excise v. Firmenich Aromatics India Pvt. Ltd.

20. os cexa 70-19.doc R.M. AMBERKAR (Private Secretary)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

O.O.C.J.

CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 70 OF 2019 Pr. Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise ..

Appellant

Versus

Firmenich Aromatics India P Ltd ..

Respondent ...................

 Mr. Sham Walve a/w Mr. Ram Ochani for the Appellant  Mr. Arnab Roy i/by Vaish Associates for the Respondent ...................

CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE : MARCH 11, 2021.

P.C.:

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

This is an appeal under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated 12.09.2018 passed by the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal Bench at Ahmedabad in Appeal No. ST/13915/2013-DB.

3.

The appeal was admitted by this Court on 01.07.2019 on the substantial question of law framed in the said order.

20. os cexa 70-19.doc 4.

Today, the appeal is before us on a praecipe filed by learned counsel for the appellant.

5.

Mr. Walve, learned standing counsel revenue submits that respondent had opted for settlement under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 and discharge certificate has been issued to the respondent by the designated committee. Therefore, in terms of the scheme, the appeal is required to be withdrawn. 6.

Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the prayer made for withdrawal of the appeal. 7.

Accordingly, we allow the appeal to be withdrawn. 8.

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.

9.

Refund as per Rules.

[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] [ UJJAL BHUYAN, J. ] Digitally signed by Ravindra M.

Amberkar Date:

2021.03.12 14:59:56 +0530 Ravindra M.

Amberkar