Mehul Jayant Parekh v. The Commissioner Of Customs(Export Promotion) And 2 ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 14 OF 2017 CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2015 Mehul Jayant Parekh REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 13 OF 2017 CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 53 OF 2015 Anwer A. Husain Patel REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 11 OF 2017 CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 55 OF 2015 Mehul Jayant Parekh REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 15 OF 2017 CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 56 OF 2015 Suresh Mandhana

REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 9 OF 2017 CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 18 OF 2015 Rakesh Naval REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 12 OF 2017 CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 4 OF 2015 Anwar A. Husain Patel REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 6 OF 2017 CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 52 OF 2015 Reema Shivdasani REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 16 OF 2017 CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 54 OF 2015 Sapan Chakravorty REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 5 OF 2017 CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2015

Ajay Jain REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 8 OF 2017 CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 6 OF 2015 Yogesh Navnitlal Parikh REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 7 OF 2017 CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 12 OF 2015 Yogesh Navnitlal Parikh REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 10 OF 2017 CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 11 OF 2015 Suresh Mandhana Mr. V. Sridharan-Senior Advocate with Mr. Prakash Shah and Mr. Jas Sanghvi i/b. M/s. PDS Legal for the applicants.

Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly for the respondents.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.

DATED :- NOVEMBER 24, 2017

P.C. :- 1.

After these review petitions were heard for some time, Mr.Jetly appearing for the respondents, on instructions, states that in the event the judgment and order under review gains finality and an effect has to be given to it by the authorities under the Customs Act, 1962, they would act strictly in accordance with the judgment and do accordingly.

2.

On this statement of Mr. Jetly and which is accepted, the review petitions are not pressed and disposed of accordingly. (DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)