The Commissioner Of Cgst And Central Excise, Navi Mumbai Commissionerate v. Pepsico India Holding P.Ltd.

Uday S. Jagtap 496-18-NMA-15=.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 496 OF 2018 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 60 OF 2018 The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise Navi Mumbai .. Applicant In the matter between The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise Navi Mumbai .. Appellant v/s.

M/s. Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd.

..Respondent Mr. Sham Walve a/w Mr. Ram Ochani for the applicant / orig. appellant None for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.J.

DATED : 27th SEPTEMBER, 2018.

P.C.

1.

None appears for the respondent despite service. 2.

This application seeks condonation of 93 days delay in filing an appeal from the order dated 27th February, 2017 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal). 3.

We have perused the affidavit in support of the motion filed by Uday Shivaji Jagtap Digitally signed by Uday Shivaji Jagtap Date:

2018.09.28 11:05:26 +0530

Uday S. Jagtap 496-18-NMA-15=.doc Mr. V. Vijayakumar, Assistant Commissioner of CGST & CE, Navi Mumbai and are satisfied with the reasons indicated therein for the delay in filing the accompanying appeal.

4.

Accordingly, motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)