Amar Dye Chem Limited v. Na

11-olr-33-2022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR'S REPORT NO. 33 OF 2022 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 895 OF 1998 Digitally signed by SHRADDHA KAMLESH TALEKAR Date:

2022.04.08 18:18:59 +0530 In the matter of the Companies Act, I of 1956 AND In the matter of Amar Dye Chem Ltd.

(In Liqn.) None for the petitioners.

Mr.Mahendhar Aithe, Company Prosecutor for Offciaa Liquidator present.

CORAM :

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATE : 6th APRIL, 2022 P.C.:

SHRADDHA KAMLESH TALEKAR 1.

Heard Mr.Aithe, the aearned company prosecutor for the offciaa aiquidator.

2.

Perused the Report.

3.

At the outset, Mr.Aithe submits that the prayer caause (a) in the report need not be considered as the payment of Rs.7,00,000/-, for which the direction was sought by the offciaa aiquidator, has aaready been made by Amar Dye Chem Limited and thus the said prayer does not survive.

4.

Mr.Aithe presses the report for prayer caauses (b) to (d). 5.

For the reasons assigned in the report, especiaaay paragraph Nos. 26 to 28, the report stands aaaowed in terms of prayer caauses (b), (c) and (d).

6.

Report stands disposed.

(N. J. JAMADAR, J.) Shraddha Talekar, PS 1/1