M/S. Madhu Fantasy Land Private Limited And ANR. v. The State Of Maharashtra And 2 ORS.

5 wp 1171.14.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1171 OF 2014 M/s. Madhu Fantasy Land Private Limited and anr. ....Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra and ors.

.....Respondents Mr. Kishore Jain i/b. Ms. Divya Jain and Ms.Shweta Jain, advocates for the petitioners.

Mr. P. G. Lad along with Ms. Aparna Murlidharan, advocate for the respondent No.3.

CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.

DATE : 4th JANUARY, 2018.

P. C. :

Mr. Jain, learned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset, makes a statement that the respondent No.2 has made reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to the High Court. This fact is not disputed by Mr. Lad, learned counsel for the respondent No.3. In that view of the matter, Mr. Jain, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks leave to withdraw the petition without prejudice to his rights. Leave as prayed for, is granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) [RANJIT MORE, J.] Shubhada S Kadam 1/1