Parul Jayant Chitalia v. Harish Tribhuvandas Vora And 13 ORS

903-S773-13.DOC SHEPHALI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 773 OF 2013 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1024 OF 2014 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1437 OF 2014 Parul Jayant Chitalia ...Plaintiff

Versus

Hrish Tribhuvandas Vora & 13 Ors.

...Defendants Mr. M. B. Singh, a/w Ms. Pooja Jalan, i/b MBS & Co., for the Plaintiff.

Mr. B. G. Saraf, for the Defendant No. 1.

Mr. Udayan S. Jain, for Defendants Nos. 2 & 3. Mr. Suresh D. Barne, for Defendants Nos. 4 and 5. CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

17th November 2016 PC:- 1.

This a an administration Suit. The Suit is settled as between the Plaintiff and Defendants Nos. 1 to 5. Defendants Nos. 6 to 14 are formal parties. Consent Terms are tendered. These are signed by the Plaintiff and the Defendants Nos. 1 to 5. They are also signed by their respective Advocates.

17th November 2016

903-S773-13.DOC 2.

I have seen the Consent Terms. They are in order. They are not contrary to law and they appear to reflect the parties' true intention and have been drawn by the parties of their own volition. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The undertakings in the Consent Terms, if any, are accepted as undertakings to the Court.

3.

The drawn up decree/order is dispensed with. However, if for the purpose of implementation of these Consent Terms, should the parties require a drawn up decree, they will be entitled to apply to the Department for one without having to make a separate application in that behalf and on production of an authenticated copy of this order. Drawn up decree is to be strictly in accordance with these Consent Terms only.

4.

Refund of court fee, if any, in accordance with the Rules. 5.

The Suit is disposed of accordingly.

6.

In view of this, Notices of Motion do not survive and are disposed of as infructuous.

7.

All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order. (G. S. PATEL, J.) 17th November 2016