Vinay Arvind Rao And 2 ORS. v. Arjun Atma Sippy And 23 ORS.

jdk 1 of 2 3.nmca.376.19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT

BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COM. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 376 OF 2019 IN COM. APPEAL (L) NO. 158 OF 2019 IN COM. CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 999 OF 2018 IN COM. SUIT NO. 885 OF 2018 Vinay Arvind Rao & Ors.

.. Applicants [Ori.Appellants]

IN THE MATTER OF:

Vinay Arvind Rao & Ors.

.. Appellants [Ori.Deft.Nos. 15 to 17] Vs.

Arjun Atma Sippy and Ors.

.. Respondents ....

Mr. Karl Shroff along with Mr. Rohan Sawant, Mr. Rahul N. Hingmire, Mr. Rachit Lakhmani and Ms. Dhanashree Badade for i/b VIS Legis Law Practice Advocates for Appellants Mr. Ranbir Singh along with Mr. H.N.Vakil and Mr. Rushil Mathur i/b Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 Mr. Munaf Virjee along with Navsher Kohli i/b Abh Law LLLD for Respondent No.9 ....

jdk 2 of 2 3.nmca.376.19.doc CORAM:PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & N.M. JAMDAR, J.

DATED :APRIL 08, 2019 P.C.:

1.

Learned counsel who appears for the contesting Respondents being Original Plaintiff No.1 and added Plaintiff No.2 as per impugned order, waives right to oppose the prayer made in the Notice of Motion seeking 14 days delay in filing the Appeal. The Notice of Motion is disposed of condoning the delay of 14 days in preferring the Appeal against the order dated 5 February 2019.

N.M.JAMDAR, J. CHIEF JUSTICE kandarkar