← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/298/2018absolute

Arun Singhal v. The Official Liquidator Of Freyssinet Prestressed Concrete Co. Ltd.

2018-07-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.R. Shriram2 pages

18.ca.298.2018.cp.633.2014.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 298 OF 2018 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 633 OF 2014 Arun Singhal .. Applicant In the matter between :

SICOM Limited .. Petitioner Vs.

The Freyssinet Prestressed Concrete Company Ltd. & Ors.

.. Respondents Ms.Shruti J. Bhavsar for applicant.

Ms.Kirti Taralkar I/b Jitendra G. Shukla for Ex-director. Mr.Mahendhar Aithe, company prosecutor for official liquidator present. CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J.

DATE : 24TH JULY 2018 P.C.

Ms. Taralkar appearing for respondents undertakes to file vakalatnama during the course of this week. Undertaking accepted. Ms. Taralkar states that there is a stay to the winding up of the company and relied on an order passed by a Single Judge in the Vacation on 29th December 2017.

I have perused the order and it does not stay the winding up order. The order only restrains the official liquidator from sealing the office of the company (in liquidation).

Shraddha Talekar PS 1/2

18.ca.298.2018.cp.633.2014.doc Therefore, in my view, prayer clause (a) can be granted. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and accordingly disposed. (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Shraddha Kamlesh Talekar Shraddha Kamlesh Talekar Date: 2018.07.26 11:15:37 +0530 Shraddha Talekar PS 2/2