Pushpa Chandrakant Samani And Mitual Chandrakant Samani v. Tushar Chandrakant Samani Of Mumbai And 2 ORS.

1/1 28.ARBP-641-2016.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.641 OF 2016 Pushpa Chandrakant Samani and Anr.

....Petitioners Vs.

Tushar Chandrakant Samani and Ors.

....Respondents ---- Mr. Ruchir Tolat i/b. L.C. Tolat for petitioners. Ms. Pushpa C. Samani, petitioner no.1 present in person. Mr. Mitul C. Samani, petitioner no.2 present in person. Mr. Firoz Bharucha a/w. Ms. Tanaaz Padania i/b. Kanga and Co. for respondent no.1.

Mr. Tushar C. Samani, respondent no.1 present in person. Mr. Kantilal G. Kotecha, Constituted Attorney of respondent nos.2 and 3 present.

---- CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J.

DATE : 27th NOVEMBER, 2017 P.C.:

Parties have amicably settled the matter and filed consent terms dated 22nd November, 2017. The consent terms signed by petitioners, respondent no.1 and constituted attorney of respondent nos.2 and 3 and their respective Advocates is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. The counsel identify the parties who have signed the consent terms.

Order in terms of the consent terms. All undertakings given in the consent terms are accepted and so ordered. Petition accordingly stands disposed.

(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Gauri Gaekwad