← Library
Bombay High CourtS/446/2016consent term

Bakul Harivadan Mehta v. Smita Harivadan Mehta And 4 Others

2016-05-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.R. Shriram2 pages

suit(L)320.16-27

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT (L) NO.320 OF 2016 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO.1131 OF 2016 Bakul Harivandan Mehta ....Plaintiff V/s.

Smita Harivadan Mehta & Ors.

....Defendants ---- Mr.K.R.Parekh for plaintiff.

Mr.Kamwal Omprakash i/by J.V.Parmar for defendants. ---- CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM,J DATE : 2.5.2016 P.C.:- The parties have amicably settled the matter. The consent terms dated 2.5.2016 signed by the plaintiff, defendant nos.1 to 5 and their respective Advocates is taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The undertakings and statements given in the consent terms are accepted and so ordered. Parties are present and have been identified by their respective Advocates. Order in terms of consent terms. Refund of court fees if any, in accordance with the Rules.

All interim orders stand vacated. All interim applications stand disposed.

The plaintiff and the applicant of the Notice of Motion to remove all office objections and get the suit and Notice of Motion numbered within four weeks from today. Application for refund of KJ

suit(L)320.16-27 court fees to be processed only after the parties comply with this direction.

All parties to act on a copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate of this Court.

(K.R.SHRIRAM,J) KJ