Chetan Navnitlal Shah v. Fizzah Navnitlal Shah And 2 ORS.

1.896.17 nma

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 896 OF 2017 IN APPEAL (L) NO. 128 OF 2017 Chetan Navnitlal Shah ....

Applicant Vs.

Fizzah Navnitlal Shah and two others ....

Respondents Mr. Darshit Jain for the appellant.

Ms. Sonali Mehta i/b Mr. Mahernosh Humranwala for the respondent no. 1. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE :

DECEMBER 11, 2017.

P.C.

It appears that mistakenly the prayer made in the notice of motion is not granted, though we had admitted the appeal. Since the appeal is admitted, it is implied that the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. Hence, we grant the prayer in the notice of motion and dispose of the same. [SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.] [SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J.] ism