Mohinidevi A. Mathrani And ANR v. Ramesh Parmanand Bhatia

902-CONP38-14.DOC Shephali

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 38 OF 2014 IN SUIT NO. 3070 OF 2010 Mohinidevi A. Mathrani & Anr.

...Petitioners

Versus

Ramesh Parmanand Bhatia

...Respondent

Mr. R. Cama, a/w Mr. Prayag Joshi, i/b Mr. B. J. Shosi, for the Petitioner.

Mr. S. Jagtiani, a/w Ms. M.Hiraskar, i/b M/s. Chitnis Vaithy & Co., for the Respondent.

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

21st October 2015 PC:- 1.

Parties tender a compilation of documents that they signed yesterday pursuant to the Consent Terms. This is taken on record and marked "X3" for identification. The consent Minutes of Order taken on record yesterday is substituted by the Consent Minutes of Order tendered today taken on record and marked "X4" for identification. In addition, there is a draft of a public notice to be

902-CONP38-14.DOC issue by the Petitioner within one week from today. This is taken on record and marked "X5" for identification.

2.

The Contempt Petition is disposed of as withdrawn in view of the document taken on record and the documents now marked for identification, including the consent minutes of order "X4". It is clarified that the order dated 20th October 2015 is to be understood to mean that the parties have now complied with the consent terms and the various orders passed thereon periodically. I trust that all parties will now cooperate with each other in the completion of registration and other formalities required pursuant to this documentation.

(G. S. PATEL, J.)