← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/595/2016disposed off

Ratanidevi Ramswaroop Gadia v. Official Liquidator Of M/S. Vaidehi Akash Housing Private Limited (Cin U45200mh1997ptc112493)

2016-11-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.C. Gupte5 pages

1/5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION (L) NO. 246 OF 2015 Ratanidevi Ramswaroop Gadia COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 861 OF 2015 Mr.Prem Prakash Kamal COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 862 OF 2015 Mr.Kiran Chaudhary

2/5 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 863 OF 2015 Sushila S. Agarwal & Anr.

...Applicants COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 864 OF 2015 Mr.Shivkumar Chaudhary & Anr.

...Applicantss COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 865 OF 2015 Mrs.Kamlesh O. Tikiya

3/5 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 866 OF 2015 Preash Developer Pvt.Ltd.

COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 867 OF 2015 Mr.Devendra M. Jalan COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 868 OF 2015 Preash Developer Pvt.Ltd.

4/5 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 869 OF 2015 Preash Developer Pvt.Ltd.

COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 870 OF 2015 Mr.Shamlal Vadhera Mr.Siddharth Murarka with Niraj Shah I/b. Law Chamber ofSiddharth Murarka for Applicant.

Mr.Mahendhar Aithe, Company Prosecutor from Official Liquidator's Office present.

CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.

22 NOVEMBER 2016

5/5 P.C. :

These applications are for leave under Section 446 for prosecution of pending suits before the Bombay City Civil Court at Dindoshi. The winding up order earlier passed on 27 November 2014 has been recalled and set aside by a later order passed by this court on 17 August 2015. There is no winding up order, in the premises, operating against the company nor is the liquidator appointed as a provisional liquidator of the company. In the premises, there is no need for leave under Section 446. The applications are dismissed.

(S.C. Gupte, J.)