Kaizer Taher Mithaiwala v. Shamima Taher Mithaiwala And 4 ORS.

20-1-IA918-2021INS295-2012.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 918 OF 2021 IN SUIT NO. 295 OF 2012 SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Kaizer Taher Mithaiwala ...Applicant In the matter between Kaizer Taher Mithaiwala ...Plaintiff

Versus

Shamima Taher Mithaiwala & ors.

...Defendants SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2023.02.10 14:26:34 +0530 Mr. Govind Pawar, for the Plaintiff.

Ms. Poonam Madhwani, for Defendant No.1.

Mr. Prem Gidwani, a/w Gauri Deshpande, for Defendant Nos.2, 3 and 5.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED :

9th FEBRUARY, 2023 PC:- 1.

The plaintiff has preferred this application to grant leave to produce the documents as included in the compilation of documents annexed to the application and mark those documents in evidence.

2.

The plaintiff is under cross-examination. Crossexamination is yet not complete. Since the plaintiff is under cross-examination, at this stage, the proposed documents cannot be marked in evidence.

1/2

20-1-IA918-2021INS295-2012.DOC 3.

The plaintiff can seek the production of these documents and, if required, re-examine himself, with the permission of the Court, and prove the documents which are proposed to be produced alongwith this application.

4.

Keeping open liberty to seek the production of documents and re-examine the plaintiff, the application stands disposed. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2