Rakesh Abanashiram Dhodi v. The Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority And ORS.

WP.1248.2012.905.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1248 OF 2012 Rakesh Abanashiram Dhodi } Petitioner versus The Mumbai Metropolitan Region } Development Authority and Anr.

} Respondents Mr. Karl Tamboly with Mr. Shailesh Poria i/b. M/s. Hariani and Co. for the Petitioner.

Ms. Kiran Bagalia with Mr. Niraj Patni i/b. Ms. Chitra Phadke for the Respondents.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & G. S. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATED :- JUNE 12, 2015 P.C. :- When the Writ Petition was placed before us on the earlier occasion, the Advocate for both sides were fair enough to handover a copy of the Minutes of the joint meeting of the lessees of workshop and Spare Parts (plot 1 to 5), 2 plots of Petrol Pump, 1 Weigh Bridge plot and Dhabha and Dormitory plot and MMRDA regarding Phase-I of Wadala Notified Area.

2) Upon instructions, Ms. Bagalia appearing for the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) states that the MMRDA will act in terms of these minutes and consider the request made by the Petitioner.

J.V.Salunke,PA

WP.1248.2012.905.doc 3) In the light of this statement made by Ms. Bagalia, the Petitioner's Counsel does not press the Writ Petition. A copy of the Minutes is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. The Writ Petition is disposed of. This order is passed in the presence of Writ Petitioner Mr. Rakesh A. Dhodi.

(G.S.KULKARNI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) J.V.Salunke,PA