The Commissioner Of Central Tax And Central Excise, Mumbai Central v. Axis Bank Ltd.

Uday S. Jagtap 323-18-nma-6=.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 323 OF 2018 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 64 OF 2018 The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Mumbai East Commissionerate .. Applicant In the matter between The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Mumbai East Commissionerate .. Appellant v/s.

Axis Bank Ltd.

..Respondent Mr. Pradeep Jetly a/w Mr. J.B. Mishra for the applicant / orig. appellant Ms. Manasi Patil for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.J.

DATED : 14th SEPTEMBER, 2018.

P.C.

1.

This motion seeks condonation of 205 days delay in filing the accompanying appeal from the order dated 15th February, 2017 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Tribunal. 2.

We have perused the affidavit dated 2nd April, 2018 of Mr. Money Jain, Assistant Commissioner, CGST and Central Excise, Mumbai Central Commissionerate. We find that the reasons indicated in Uday Shivaji Jagtap by Uday Shivaji Jagtap Date:

2018.09.18 11:19:49 +0530

Uday S. Jagtap 323-18-nma-6=.doc support of the motion sufficiently explain the delay in filing the accompanying appeal.

3.

Ms. Patil, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent has no objection at the delay being condoned.

4.

In the above view, Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)