The Commissioner Of Cgst And Central Excise,Belapur Commissionerate v. Reliance Communications Ltd

Uday S. Jagtap 431-18-NMA-10=.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 431 OF 2018 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 58 OF 2018 The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise Belapur Commissionerate .. Applicant In the matter between The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise Belapur Commissionerate .. Appellant v/s.

M/s. Reliance Communication Ltd.

..Respondent Ms. P.S. Cardozo for the applicant / orig. appellant Mr. Chirag Shetty I/b Economics Laws Practice for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.J.

DATED : 6th SEPTEMBER, 2018.

P.C.

1.

This motion has been taken out for condonation of 323 days dealy in filing the appeal from the order dated 2nd September, 2015 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The affidavit in support of the motion of Mr. Sadanand D. Pattanaik, Assistant Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise, Division-IV, Belapur Commissionerate sets out the reasons for the delay in filing the accompanying appeal.

Digitally signed by Uday Shivaji Jagtap Date:

2018.09.11 17:12:01 +0530 Uday Shivaji Jagtap

Uday S. Jagtap 431-18-NMA-10=.doc 2.

Mr. Shetty, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents, on instructions, states that the respondent do not oppose the application made by the appellant Revenue.

3.

In the above view, the motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)