Preetinder Singh v. Mumbai Port Trust And ANR

1/2 wp-957-07.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

O.O.C.J.

WRIT PETITION NO.957 OF 2007 ...

Preetinder Singh

...Petitioner

v/s.

Mumbai Port Trust & ors.

...Respondents

...

Ms.Shobana Gopal for the Petitioner.

Ms.Kavita Anchan i/b M.V.Kini & Co. for Respondent No.1. Mr.N.R.Prajpati for UoI.

...

CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA & A.A.SAYED, JJ.

DATED : 23 NOVEMBER 2015 ORDER:

Matter is called out from the final hearing Board. 2.

Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner makes a statement that she has no instructions in the matter from the Petitioner inspite of repeated communications.

3.

Learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.1, on instructions, makes a statement that the Petitioner has already taken V.R.S. in June, 2014 and all financial benefits have been granted and the order passed by this Court has already complied with. Uday P. Kambli 1/2

2/2 wp-957-07.doc 4.

In view of this the present Petition is disposed of with liberty to revive the Petition, if so instructed.

5.

Rule discharged. No order as to costs.

(A.A. SAYED, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA J.) Uday P. Kambli 2/2