Vvf (India) Limited And ANR v. The Designated Authority And ANR

suresh 901-WPLG-1146.2018.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION {L} NO.1146 OF 2018 M/s. VVF (India) Limited & Anr.

.... Petitioners Vs.

The Designated Authority & Anr.

.... Respondents WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS {L} NO.196 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION {L} NO.1146 OF 2018 Galaxy Surfactants Limited .... Applicant In the matter between VVF (India) Limited & Anr.

.... Petitioners Vs.

The Designated Authority & Anr.

.... Respondents Mr. Rafique Dada, Senior Counsel with Mr. Vineet Naik, Senior Counsel, Mr. Lalan Gupta, Ms Reena Khaire & Ms Soumya Prakash i/by M/s. Dhruve Liladhar & Co. for the Petitioners.

Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly with Mr. D.P. Singh for the Respondents.

Mr. V. Sridharan, Senior Counsel with Mr. Prakash Shah & Mr. Jas Sanghvi i/by PDS Legal for the Applicant in CHSWL-196/2018.

suresh 901-WPLG-1146.2018.doc CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.

DATE : APRIL 20, 2018 P.C:

1.

After this petition was argued for some time, on instructions, Mr. Dada, learned Senior Counsel, seeks leave to withdraw it with liberty to raise all contentions, including on the alleged prejudice caused by the breach of principles of natural justice, as also not taking into account a legal contention raised by the petitioners.

2.

We allow the writ petition to be withdrawn by clarifying that all contentions, as raised in the petition, are kept open for being urged at an appropriate stage. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of.

3.

In view of disposal of the writ petition as withdrawn, Chamber Summons {Lodging} No.196 of 2018 does not survive and it accordingly stands disposed of.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)