Sunita K. Ramanathan v. Sudha Ameet Kannur And ANR.

chs 645 of 2015 (945).sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.645 OF 2015 IN SUIT NO.339 OF 2015 Sunita K. Ramanathan ...

Applicant/Plaintiff versus Sudha Ameet Kannur and Anr.

...

Defendants and Viswanath Krishnamurthy ...

Proposed Defendant Mr. S.C.

Thakkar, for Plaintiff.

Mr. Satyaprakash Sharma with Mr. Ashok Asthana, Mr. Pravin Vaity i/by M/s. Abdi and Co., for Defendant No.1 and proposed Defendant. CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.

DATE: 8 th DECEMBER, 2015 P.C.:

1.

Mr. Sharma, the learned Advocate appearing for for Defendant No.1 and the proposed Defendant - Viswanath Krishnamurthy, states that he has no objection if the above Chamber Summons is allowed and the proposed Defendant is joined as Defendant No.3 to the above Suit. In view thereof, the Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b), which are reproduced hereunder : "(a)Delay if any, in taking out the Chamber Summons be condoned; (b)Plaintiff be permitted to carry out the amendment to the Plaint and Notice of Motion as per the schedule annexed hereto"; ssp 1/2

chs 645 of 2015 (945).sxw 2.

Amendments to be carried out within one week from today. The Chamber Summons is accordingly disposed of.

3.

Place the Suit for Directions on 15-01-2016.

( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. ) ssp 2/2