Ramesh Dhanyakumar Kasture v. Gautam Sukhdeo Chabukswar

905 AEP 1-17=.doc FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2017 IN APPLICATION (L) NO. 5 OF 2017 IN ELECTION PETITION NO. 12 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. Sachin Dhakephalkar for the Applicant.

Mr. Pramod Patil for the Respondent.

CORAM : K. K. TATED, J.

DATED : 19/04/2017 P.C.:

.

Not on board. Taken on board for urgent orders.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

This application is preferred by the Petitioner to carry out appropriate amendment in prayer Clause (a) of Application (L) No. 5 of 2017.

The learned Counsel for the Respondent submits that without going into the merits of the matter, they have no objection to allow the applicant to carry out amendment as they prayed.

Sneha Chavan 1/2

905 AEP 1-17=.doc Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant and as no objection given by the learned Counsel for the Respondent, without going into merits of the matter, following order is passed:

a) Applicant is permitted to carry out appropriate amendment in prayer clause (a) of the Application (L) No. 5 of 2017 during the course of the day.

b) Applicant is permitted to serve the amended copy of application on the Respondent. c) Reverification is dispensed with.

d) Application stands disposed of accordingly.

(K.K.TATED, J.) Sneha Chavan 2/2