M/S. Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. v. Surjan Singh Gurdayal Singh And ANR

59.N.590.17 in EXA.416.17.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION NOTICE NO. 590 OF 2017 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 416 OF 2017 WITH EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 416 OF 2017 M/s. Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd.

...

Claimant

Versus

Surjan Singh Gurdayal Singh & Anr.

...

Respondents Ms. Ekta Pednekar i/b Mr. Sachin Masurkar for the Claimant/Applicant. CORAM : R.I. CHAGLA, J.

DATED : 17th JUNE, 2019.

P.C. :

The learned Counsel for the Applicant seeks notice under Order XXI Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, against Respondent No.1 to appear in person or by an Advocate entitled to practice in this Court to show cause why the award passed by the Sole Arbitrator, Mumbai, should not be executed against Respondent No.1. The learned Counsel for the Applicant states that in so far as Respondent No.2 is concerned, the address of Respondent No.2 is of Raigad. Therefore, she seeks notice only against Respondent No.1.

Waghmare 1/2

59.N.590.17 in EXA.416.17.doc Considering that Respondent No.1 is residing in Mumbai and has been served and has chosen not to make any appearance, Notice is issued under Order XXI Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 to appear either in person or through an Advocate entitled to practice in this Court on the next date i.e. 01.07.2019 to show cause why the award passed by the Sole Arbitrator should not be executed against the Respondent No.1.

Notice is made absolute.

List the Execution Application on 01.07.2019. (R.I. CHAGLA, J.) Waghmare 2/2