Anik Industries Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer Ward 3 (1) (1) And The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3

902-NMA.315.2018.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Jayant Vishwanath Salunke NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 315 OF 2018 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 826 OF 2018 Jayant Vishwanath Salunke Date: 2018.09.03 12:14:22 +0530 Anik Industries Ltd.

} Applicant versus Income Tax Officer, Ward 3 } (1)(1) and the Commissioner } of Income Tax-3 } Respondents Mr. M. Subramanian with Mr. Vishnu S.

Hadade for the applicant.

Mr. Sham Walve for the respondents.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.

DATE :- AUGUST 31, 2018 P.C. :- 1.

Heard both sides.

2.

For the reasons set out in the affidavit in support, the delay of 156 days in filing the appeal is condoned. The notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). There would be no order as to costs.

3.

List the appeal for admission as per its turn. (B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) J.V.Salunke,PA