← Library
Bombay High CourtNMCA/535/2019disposed off

Pranav Ansal v. Vistra Itcl (India) Ltd. And 2 ORS

2019-04-15Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar3 pages

vai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION COMMERCIAL APPEAL (LODGING) NO.201 OF 2019 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.259 OF 2019 IN COMMERCIAL SUIT NO.69 OF 2019 Pranav Ansal ...Appellant V/s.

Vistra ITCL (India) Limited & Ors.

...Respondents

WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (LODGING) NO.409 OF 2019 IN COMMERCIAL APPEAL (LODGING) NO.201 OF 2019 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.259 OF 2019 IN COMMERCIAL SUIT NO.69 OF 2019 Pranav Ansal ...Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :

Pranav Ansal ...Appellant V/s.

Vistra ITCL (India) Limited & Ors.

...Respondents

Mr.J.P. Sen,Senior Counsel with Mr.Dhiraj Mehta and Ms.Smriti Tewari I/b Khaitan Legal Associates for the Appellant. 1/3

Ms.Akanksha Agarwal with Mr.Pratik Pawar and Ms.Shanaya Cyrus Irani I/b J.Sagar Associates for the Respondents. CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & N.M. JAMDAR, J.

DATE : 15TH APRIL, 2019.

P.C. :- 1.

The Registry to assign a number to the appeal. 2.

The appellant is a Director of respondent no.2, who is defendant no.1 in the suit.

3.

On 25th July, 2018, in a suit filed by the first respondent, it has been directed that the Directors of the first defendant in the suit would not leave the territory of India without taking prior permission from the Court. The appellant has to travel to Istanbul from 19th April, 2019 to 22nd April, 2019. On return to India, the appellant has to travel to London from 1st May, 2019 to 8th May, 2019. 4.

Learned counsel for the plaintiff - respondent no.1 in the appeal does not dispute that earlier permissions granted to the appellant to travel abroad were honoured, in the sense, the appellant return to India. Learned counsel for the respondent states that the respondent has instructed to inform the Court its no objection to the appellant travelling to Istanbul and London for the durations mentioned herein above.

2/3

5.

Order accordingly.

6.

The appeal is disposed of.

7.

In view of disposal of the appeal, the notice of motion does not survive and the same is accordingly disposed of. (N.M. JAMDAR, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE) 3/3