← Library
Bombay High CourtNMA/836/2017absolute

Anwer A Husain Patel v. The Commissioner Of Customs(Export Promotion)

2017-11-24Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.C. Dharmadhikari4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 835 OF 2017 REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 14 OF 2017 CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2015 Mehul Jayant Parekh NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 836 OF 2017 REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 13 OF 2017 CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 53 OF 2015 Anwer A. Husain Patel NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 837 OF 2017 REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 11 OF 2017 CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 55 OF 2015 Mehul Jayant Parekh NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 838 OF 2017 REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 15 OF 2017 CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 56 OF 2015

Suresh Mandhana NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 839 OF 2017 REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 9 OF 2017 CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 18 OF 2015 Rakesh Naval NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 840 OF 2017 REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 12 OF 2017 CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 4 OF 2015 Anwar A. Husain Patel NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 841 OF 2017 REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 6 OF 2017 CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 52 OF 2015 Reema Shivdasani

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 842 OF 2017 REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 16 OF 2017 CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 54 OF 2015 Sapan Chakravorty NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 843 OF 2017 REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 5 OF 2017 CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2015 Ajay Jain NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 844 OF 2017 REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 8 OF 2017 CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 6 OF 2015 Yogesh Navnitlal Parikh NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 845 OF 2017 REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 7 OF 2017 CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 12 OF 2015

Yogesh Navnitlal Parikh NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 846 OF 2017 REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 10 OF 2017 CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 11 OF 2015 Suresh Mandhana Mr. V. Sridharan-Senior Advocate with Mr. Prakash Shah and Mr. Jas Sanghvi i/b. M/s. PDS Legal for the applicants.

Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly for the respondents.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.

DATED :- NOVEMBER 24, 2017 P.C. :- For the reasons set out in the notices of motion, the delay is condoned. The notices of motion are made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). The notices of motion are disposed of. There would be no order as to costs.

(DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)