Central Warehousing Corporation v. M/S. Essar Oils Limited And Anohter

Megha 16_nma_1202_2016.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION (APPEALS) NO.1202 OF 2016 IN APPEAL (L) NO.509 OF 2014 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.33 OF 2011 Central Warehousing Corporation ...Applicant

Versus

Essar Oil Ltd. and Anr.

...Respondents

...

Mr. R.K. Sharma for the Applicant.

CORAM : A.S. OKA & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.

DATED : 29th NOVEMBER, 2016.

P. C. :

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant. The appeal preferred by the Applicant has been rejected under the orders of Prothonotary and Senior Master in exercise the power under Rule 986 of the Bombay High Court Original Side Rules. In view of the averments made in the affidavit in support, a case for restoration is made out. Accordingly the notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to condition that the Applicant will remove all office objections within a period of one month from today. Megha 1/2

Megha 16_nma_1202_2016.doc 2.

If office objections are not removed within the prescribed time, the order of the Prothonotary and Senior Master shall stand. (ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.) Megha 2/2