← Library
Bombay High CourtN/971/2016disposed off

Nimbus Communication Ltd v. Sippy Films Private Limited

2017-11-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.K. Tated2 pages

3 n971-16 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NO.971 OF 2016 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Prothonotary's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr.Sandesh Godse i/b M/s.Vivek Patil & Associates for the claimant CORAM : K. K. TATED, J.

DATE : NOVEMBER 21, 2017 P.C.:

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the Claimant.

2.

Advocate for the claimant submits that they already served the respondent and filed affidavit of service in the Registry. Statement is accepted. 3.

By this Notice, under Order XXI Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Claimant is seeking permission to proceed with Execution Application to execute the award dated 12.10.2010 in Arbitration proceeding.

4.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Claimant and the averments made in affidavit in support of Execution Application, I am satisfied that the Claimant has made out a case for allowing the Mohite 1/2

3 n971-16 notice. Hence, following order is passed:

a) Notice preferred by Claimant under Order XXI Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is allowed.

b) Claimant to proceed with the Execution Application according to law to execute the award dated 12.10.2010.

c) Notice stands disposed of accordingly.

(K.K.TATED, J.) Mohite 2/2