The Official Liquidator Of Etisalat Db Telecom Pvt. Ltd . (In Liquidation) v. Etisalat Mauritius Limited. (Petitioner)

bipin prithiani 6-olr-43.24.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BIPIN DHARMENDER PRITHIANI DHARMENDER PRITHIANI Date: 2024.04.29 10:21:25 +0530 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR REPORT NO. 43 OF 2024 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 114 OF 2012 In the matter of The Companies Act, I of 1956;

AND In the matter of Etisalat DB Telecom Pvt. Ltd. (in liquidation) Etisalat Mauritius Limited ... Petitioner ****** Ms. Mansi Kaku for Official Liquidator.

Mr. Chandan Kumar, Official Liquidator.

Ms. Mansi Kaku a/w Ms. Meetali Mendhe and Ms. Sakshi Sharma i/by Mr. J. S. Solomon, Legal Advisor to the Official Liquidator. ****** CORAM: MANISH PITALE, J.

DATE : 26th APRIL 2024 P.C. :

.

Heard learned counsel for the Official Liquidator. 2.

By this Official Liquidator's Report (OLR), the official liquidator praying for following directions : "(i) in view of paragraph 12 herein above, whether this Hon'ble Court would be pleased to allow the Official Liquidator to pay the professional fees of INR 10,50,000 (Indian Rupees Ten Lakhs Fifty Thousand only) as per "Exhibits D-1 to D-4" hereto to Mr. Hiro

bipin prithiani 6-olr-43.24.doc Rai, Advocate after deducting TDS from the funds lying to the credit of the Company (In Liqn).

(ii) in view of paragraph 13 herein above, whether this Hon'ble Court would be pleased to allow the Official Liquidator to pay the professional fees of INR 59,14,160 (Indian Rupees Fifty Nine Lakhs Fourteen Thousand One Hundred and Sixty only) as per "Exhibits E-1 to E-93 hereto to M/s Mehta Chokshi & Shah LLP, Chartered Accountants after deducting TDS from the funds lying to the credit of the Company (In Liqn)"

3.

The said directions are sought in the context of payments to be made to the Advocate and Chartered Accountant, whose professional services were taken by the office of the official liquidator. In support of the directions, relevant documents have been filed and a summary of the same is specifically stated in the OLR. This Court has perused the details.

4.

For the reasons stated in the OLR, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (i) and (ii), quoted hereinabove. MANISH PITALE, J.