← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1249/2018disposed off

Indrajeet Sarkar Nimbalkar v. Registrar Of Companies, Mumbai And ANR.

2018-04-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shantanu S. Kemkar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL/APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4824 OF 2018 (A.S.) Debashis Das and Another

...Petitioners

vs.

Union of India and Others

...Respondents

WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4825 OF 2018 (A.S.) Sunil Girdharlal Mittal

...Petitioner

vs.

Union of India and Others

...Respondents

WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.1283 OF 2018 (O.S.) Bakulesh Dhirajlal Sanghavi and Another

...Petitioners

vs.

Registrar of Companies, Mumbai and Another

...Respondents

WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.1284 OF 2018 (O.S.) Rashmi Chandak and Others

...Petitioners

vs.

Registrar of Companies, Mumbai and Another

...Respondents

WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.1250 OF 2018 (O.S.) Indrajeet Sarkar Nimbalkar

...Petitioner

vs.

Registrar of Companies, Mumbai and Another

...Respondents

1/3

Mr. Naveen Maheshwari, for the Petitioners in W.P. No. 4824 of 2018 and 4625 of 2018.

Mr. R.D. Oak, for the Petitioner in WPL No.1250 of 2018. Ms. Khushboo Shah i/b.AKR Advisor, for the Petitioner in WPL No. 1283 of 2018.

Ms. Prachi Pandya i/b. M/s. Corporate Attorneys, for the Petitioner in WPL No.1284 of 2018.

Mr. Ashish Mehta a/w. Ms. Surabhi Soni, for the Respondent-UOI. CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ.

DATE :

APRIL 17, 2018 P.C.:

.

Parties through their counsel.

2.

The learned counsel for the parties submit that the question involved in these Petitions has already been considered and decided by various orders passed by this Court including the order passed in Writ Petition No. 148 of 2018 (Shailendrajit Charanjit Rai and Anr. vs. The Registrar of Companies and Anr.) as also in the Writ Petition No. 3833 of 2018 (Somansundaran Peedikaparambil vs. Union of India). The said orders were passed by two Division Benches of this Court considering the various other orders passed by the High Court at Delhi. In the circumstances, for the reasons stated in Writ 2/3

Petition Nos. 148 of 2018 and 3833 of 2018, the Petitions are disposed of.

3.

We make it clear that the date of COD Scheme has already been extended up to 30th April, 2018. The said date shall apply in these matters also.

4.

The Petitions are disposed of accordingly.

(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.) 3/3