Atmaram Broking Co Pvt Ltd. v. Glodyne Technoserve Ltd. And 2 ORS.

Mujahed 24 & 25-NMCD-182-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 182 OF 2017 IN COMMERCIAL SUMMARY SUIT NO. 82 OF 2017 Mr. Anand Sarnaaik & Anr ...Applicants

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Dilipkumar Atmaram Nagpal ...Plaintiff V/s.

M/s. Glodyne Technoserve Pvt Ltd & Ors ...Defendants WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 187 OF 2017 IN COMMERCIAL SUMMARY SUIT NO. 76 OF 2017 Mr. Anand Sarnaaik & Anr ...Applicants

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Atmaram Broking Co. Pvt Ltd ...Plaintiff V/s.

M/s. Glodyne Technoserve Pvt Ltd & Ors ...Defendants 1/2

Mujahed 24 & 25-NMCD-182-2017 Ms. Bhargavi Raval I/b. Ms. Rekha C. Shukla for the Plaintiff. Mr. Ganesh Ambekar a/w. Mr. Rajendra Jain I/b. Thakore Jariwala & Associates for Defendant Nos. 2 and 3/Applicants. CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.

DATE : 07 MARCH, 2018.

P.C. :- 1.

These motions are taken out by Defendant Nos. 2 and 3 for condonation of delay in entering an appearance in the commercial suit filed under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 2.

There is a delay of 10 days. The delay has been duly explained in the affidavit in support of both the notice of motions. Learned counsel for the Plaintiff opposes the application. 3.

Considering the ground made out in the affidavit by Defendants-Applicants, the delay is condoned. Accordingly, both the notice of motions are made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b).

(S.C. GUPTE, J.) 2/2