Indersain Bhimsain Nangia Nd ANR, v. Veena Surinder Sidhwani

sg ts69-15.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.69 OF 2015 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.882 OF 2014 AND CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.91 OF 2015 Indersain Bhimsain Mangia And Anr.

...Plaintiffs vs Veena Surinder Sindhwani ....Defendant ....

Mr. Murari Madekar, i/b. Madekar & Co., for the Plaintiffs. Mr. Swapnil Ambure, a/w. Mikhail Dey, i/b. Dinesh Tiwari & Associates, for the Defendant.

....

CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.

DATED: 21 NOVEMBER, 2017 P.C. :

.

Learned Counsel for the parties tender Consent Terms duly signed by the parties and their respective Advocates. Learned Counsel seek an order in terms of the Consent Terms. The application is made in presence of the parties in person or through their authorized representatives. The Consent Terms are taken on record, marked "X" for identification. Statements and undertakings contained therein are accepted. Learned Counsel for the Defendant, in the presence of the Defendant along with her son Mr. Pavan Sindhwani, confirms having received two banker's cheques aggregating to Rs.37.50 lakhs each in accordance with the Consent Terms. Considering the Consent Terms and Pg 1 of 2

sg ts69-15.doc the consent affidavit filed by the Defendant in terms of the Consent Terms, which is also tendered across the bar today, and which is taken on record, the conversion of the Testamentary Petition into the Testamentary Suit as a contested matter stands revoked. The Testamentary Petition shall now be treated as an uncontested matter and probate will be issued accordingly by the office. ( S.C. GUPTE, J. ) Pg 2 of 2