Tata Motors Finance Ltd. v. Mohd Yunus Hanif And ANR

6 n1082-16 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NO.1082 OF 2016 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Prothonotary's orders Court's or Judge's orders Ms.Bhagyashri Mangale i/b Mr.E.A.Sasi for the applicant CORAM : K. K. TATED, J.

DATE : NOVEMBER 21, 2017 P.C.:

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant.

2.

The learned counsel for the applicant submits that respondents are duly served. She submits that they already filed Affidavit of Service in the Registry. Statement is accepted.

3.

By this Notice under Order XXI Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Claimant is seeking permission to continue with the Execution Application to execute the award dated 19.4.2011. 4.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and the averments made in affidavit in support of Execution Application, I am satisfied that applicant has made out a case for allowing the Notice. Hence, following order is passed:

Mohite 1/2

6 n1082-16 a) Notice under Order XXI Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 preferred by Claimant for execution of award dated 19.4.2011 is allowed. b) Claimant can proceed with Execution Application according to law.

c) Notice stands disposed of accordingly.

(K.K.TATED, J.) Mohite 2/2