Vikas Gupta v. Tata Consultancy Services

1.APP444.14.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 444 OF 2014 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 130 OF 2007 Vikas Gupta.

... Appellant.

Versus

Tata Consultancy Services.

... Respondent.

--- Mr. Y.K. Sharma a/w. Mr. Kiran Mohite and Ms. Rajshri Mohite i/b. Mr. Kiran Mohite, advocate for Appellant.

Mr. Sanket Paralkar, Assistant Manager, Human Resource, Tata Consultancy Ltd.

--- CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA AND SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV,JJ DATE : MARCH 28, 2016 ORDER :

The parties have settled the matter and accordingly, have filed Consent Terms dated 23rd March, 2016. There is no objection with regard to the signatures as well as authorisation. The advocate for the appellant has also signed the same. The respondent has not engaged any advocate. However, resting upon the authorisation, Consent Term is taken on record and marked as article "X". The statement is made that no third person party will be affected by this Consent Term, as the dispute is between the parties only. In view Talwalkar 1/2

1.APP444.14.sxw of the above, present appeal is disposed of in view of the Consent Terms, as the award is fully satisfied. No cost. (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV,J) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J) Talwalkar 2/2