Sukhmindar Singh Hundal v. State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

ash wp-2399.03 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2399 OF 2003 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's Court's or orders or directions & Judge's orders.

Registrar's orders.

None for the Petitioner.

Shri F. Devetri, Senior Counsel along with Ms. Hemlata Jain and Ms.S.G.Vedpathak i/b Maneksha & Sethna for the Respondent Nos.5 and 6. Shri L.T. Satelkar, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4 State. Shri Rohan Kadam i/b Shri K.D.Abichandani for the Respondent No.8. - CORAM :

A.S. OKA & A.A.SAYED, JJ DATED :

24TH OCTOBER 2016 P.C.:

.

Perused the order dated 14th October 2016 passed in Writ Petition No.1915 of 2001. None appears for the Petitioner. In view of what is recorded in Paragraph 2 of the order dated 14th October 2016, the Petition is disposed of. Rule is discharged. We make it clear that if the Petitioner applies for restoration, the Petitioner will have to satisfy that the cause of action still continues to survive.

(A.A.SAYED, J) (A.S.OKA, J)