Padmabhushan Vasantdada Patil Pratishthan v. All India Council For Technical Education And 2 ORS.

907-WP.1733.2013.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1733 OF 2013 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 326 OF 2014 Padmabhushan Vasantdada Patil } Pratishthan } Petitioner versus All India Council for Technical } Education and Ors.

} Respondents Mr.P.J.Thorat for the petitioner (absent).

Mr.Abhijeet A. Joshi for respondent no.1.

Ms.Jyoti Chavan-AGP for respondent nos.

2 and 3.

Mr.Shaikh Mohammad Taha I/b.

M/s.Ethos Legal Alliance for the intervener in NMW/326/2014.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & M. S. KARNIK, JJ.

DATE :- FEBRUARY 5, 2019 P.C. :- 1.

Both, the petitioner and the advocate are absent. Though the petitioner is common to Writ Petition No. 1733 of 2013 and Writ Petition No. 2532 of 2014, we find that in Writ Petition No.2532 of 2014 the very petitioner is ready to argue the matter. That very petitioner in this petition is not attending the case though having engaged an advocate. Even the advocate has not J.V.Salunke,P.S.

907-WP.1733.2013.doc withdrawn his vakalatnama, if there was any issue like want of instructions.

2.

In these circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Any ad-interim order made therein will stand vacated forthwith.

3.

In the light of the dismissal of the writ petition, the notice of motion does not survive and stands disposed of as such. (M.S.KARNIK, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) J.V.Salunke,P.S.