Citifinancial Consumer Finance India Ltd. v. Harish Sadhnani And ANR. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd- Applicant

43-CHS-539-2013.DOC Jsn

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 539 OF 2013 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION (L) NO. 484 OF 2011 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO. AR/ARB/1367 of 2009 Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.

... Applicant In the matter between Citi Financial Consumer Finance India Ltd ... Petitioner

Versus

Harish Sadhnani ... Defendant Ms. Juhi Bhogle, i/b. O.M. Gujar Law Chambers for Applicant. None for the Respondents.

CORAM:

RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J DATED:

5TH APRIL 2018.

PC:- 1.

The learned counsel appearing for the Applicant states that the Applicant is seeking necessary amendment to the execution application as per schedule annexed to the Chamber Summons. She states that by a Deed of Assignment executed between the original Decree Holder and the Applicant, the receivables along with the underlying security have been assigned by the original Decree Holder to the Applicant. She relies on schedule I to the Deed of Assignment and in particular Sr. No.258 wherein the name of the Judgment Debtor appears. She states that in light of Deed of Assignment, the receivables have been assigned to the Applicant.

1/2

43-CHS-539-2013.DOC 2.

I have perused the Deed of Assignment as well as schedule 1 to the Deed of Assignment and in particular serial number 258, wherein Judgment Debtor's name appears. I am satisfied that the receivables from the Judgment Debtor has been assigned to the Applicant.

3.

Accordingly, the Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment shall be carried out within a period of two weeks of the order being uploaded. ( RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J. ) 2/2