Agartadshrishantinathji Maharaj Jain And ORS. v. The Municipal Coporation Of Greater And ORS.

911-PIL.116.2012+1.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 116 OF 2012 Shri. Agartad Shri. Shantinathji } Maharaj Jain Derasar Trust } Petitioner versus The Municipal Corporation of } Greater Mumbai and Ors.

} Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1731 OF 2009 Shree Vardhaman Stanakvasi Jain } Shravak Sangh } Petitioner versus The Municipal Corporation of } Greater Mumbai and Ors.

} Respondents Mr.Vijay S. Sharma for the petitioner in PIL/116/2012absent. M/s. Thakordas and Madgavkar for the petitioner in WP/1731/2009-absent.

Ms.K.H.Mastakar for the Municipal Corporation in both the matters.

Mr.Milind More-Additional Government Pleader for the State in PIL/116/2012.

Mr.S.B.Gore-AGP for State in WP/1731/2009.

Mr.N.R.Prajapati for the Union of India.

Mr.Sanmish Gala with Mr.Ankur Gala I/b.

M/s.Makrand Gandhi and Co. for respondent no. 5 in WP/1731/2009 and for respondent no. 6 in PIL/116/2012.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & R. I. CHAGLA, JJ.

DATED :- NOVEMBER 14, 2019 J.V.SALUNKE,PS

911-PIL.116.2012+1.doc P.C. :- 1.

The petitioners and their advocates both are absent. On this PIL and the writ petition, on 26th June, 2012, this court passed a detailed order. That detailed order takes note of the grievance and therefore, while refusing interim relief, this court has expressed an opinion on the main issue as well.

2.

To our mind, the petitioners and their advocates, realising that there are no interim orders, made further request to this court to take up the matters.

3.

By keeping the larger issue open for a decision in an appropriate case, the PIL petition as also the writ petition both are disposed of.

(R.I.CHAGLA, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) J.V.SALUNKE,PS