← Library
Bombay High CourtTS/57/2013disposed off

Mohan Chandumal Makhija v. Sunil Makhija

2017-04-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.R. Shriram2 pages

903.ts.57.2013.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 57 OF 2013 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 944 OF 2011 Smt. Sadori Chandumal Makhija .. Deceased Mohan Chandumal Makhija .. Plaintiff Vs.

Shri Sunil Chandumal Makhija .. Defendant Ms.Jacinta D'silva for plaintiff.

Ms.K.C. Nichani for defendant.

Mr.Mohan Chandumal Makhija-plaintiff and Mr.Meghraj Karia are present in Court.

Mr.Sunil Makhija-defendant present in Court.

CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J.

DATE : 4TH APRIL, 2017 P.C.

The parties have amicably settled the matter and have tendered the consent terms, dated 30th March 2017. The said consent terms is signed by the plaintiff, the defendant and one Meghraj R. Karia, whose name appears in paragraph 3 of the consent terms, and respective advocates of the plaintiff and the defendant.

The consent terms is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. Ms.Nichani states that the plaintiff, the defendant and the said Shraddha Talekar PS 1/2

903.ts.57.2013.doc Karia are present in Court and identify the three persons. All undertakings in the consent terms are accepted.

Order in terms of the consent terms.

Drawn up decree dispensed with.

No order as to costs.

(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Shraddha Talekar PS 2/2