Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-8, Mumbai v. Siemens Technology Services Pvt. Ltd.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1577 OF 2016 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1582 OF 2016 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-5 ... Appellant V/s.
M/s Malabar Hill Club Ltd.
... Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.761 OF 2017 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-21 ... Appellant V/s.
Mr.Gurunath Madhav Kher ... Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.783 OF 2017 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-17 ... Appellant V/s.
Auto Finance Enterprises ... Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1054 OF 2017 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-8 ... Appellant V/s.
M/s Siemens Technology Services Pvt. Ltd.
... Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1464 OF 2017 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-21 ... Appellant V/s.
Ashwin Narendra Lodha ... Respondent
WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1502 OF 2017 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-7 ... Appellant V/s.
Power Master Engineers Pvt. Ltd.
... Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2679 OF 2017 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-20 ... Appellant V/s.
Meghayields ... Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL(L) NO.1365 OF 2018 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-30 ... Appellant V/s.
Yogen D. Sanghvi ... Respondent --- Mr.Sham Walve for the Appellants.
Mr.Ashok Boghani i/by M/s Ashok Boghani & Co. for the Respondent in ITXA No.761 of 2017.
Mr.Atul Jasani for the Respondent in ITXA No.1054 of 2017. Mr.B.V.Jhaveri for the Respondent in ITXA No.1464 of 2017. Mr.Jitendra Singh for the Respondent in ITXA No.1502 of 2017. --- CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 13, 2018.
P.C.:- 1.
These Appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961
(the Act) challenge the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal).
2.
Mr.Sham Walve, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue states that he has been instructed not to press these appeals. This for the reason that the tax effect in each of these appeals is less than Rs.50 lakhs as provided in CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11th July, 2018.
3.
Accordingly, all these Appeals are dismissed as not pressed. 4.
Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules.
(M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.) ....