The Principal Commissioner Of Service Tax-Vi v. Oracle Financial Services Software Ltd.

Uday S. Jagtap 439-18-NMA-14=.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 439 OF 2018 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 302 OF 2015 The Pr. Commissioner of Service Tax-IV .. Applicant In the matter between The Pr. Commissioner of Service Tax-IV .. Appellant v/s.

M/s. Oracle Financial Services Software Ltd.

..Respondent Mr. Swapnil Bangur I/b Ms. Shalaka Gujar for the applicant / orig. appellant Mr. Bharat Rai Chandani a/w Ms. Ankita Vashistha I/b UBR Legal for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.J.

DATED : 6th SEPTEMBER, 2018.

P.C.

1.

This motion has been taken out for condonation of 53 days delay in filing the appeal from the order dated 31st December, 2014 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The affidavit in support of the motion of Ms. Sumity Garg, Assistant Commissioner, CGST, Division-VII, Mumbai East Commissionerate dated 26th April, 2017 sets out the reasons for the delay in filing the accompanying appeal.

Digitally signed by Uday Shivaji Jagtap Date:

2018.09.11 17:12:00 +0530 Uday Shivaji Jagtap

Uday S. Jagtap 439-18-NMA-14=.doc 2.

We have perused the affidavit of Ms. Sumity Garg, Assistant Commissioner, CGST, Division-VII, Mumbai East Commissionerate dated 26th April, 2017 and are satisfied with the reasons for the delay in filing an appeal.

3.

In the above view, the motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)