← Library
Bombay High CourtITXA/838/2004

The Commissionr Of Income-Tax, v. M/S Centaur Pharmaceuticals Pvt.Ltd.

2018-06-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandeep Kashinath Shinde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice M.S. Sanklecha2 pages

Rane * 1/2 * ITXA-838-2004 (SR.83) Friday, 15.6.2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 838 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income-Tax ....Appellant V/s.

M/s. Centaur Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.

....Respondent * * * * * Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the appellant. CORAM :- CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, & M.S. SANKLECHA, & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

DATE :- DATE :- 15TH JUNE, 2018.

15TH JUNE, 2018.

P.C. :- P.C. :- 1.

This Appeal was admitted on 9th October, 2007 and relates to Assessment Year 1997-98.

Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue invited our attention to Circular No.21 of 2015 issued by the Central Board for Direct Tax dated 10th December, 2015. In particular, our attention is invited to paragraphs Nos.3 and 10 therein, which read as under:- "3:- Henceforth, appeals/SLPs shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limits given hereunder:- S. No.

Appeals in Income Tax matters Monetary Limit (in Rs.)

Rane * 2/2 * ITXA-838-2004 (SR.83) Friday, 15.6.2018 Before Appellate Tribunal 10,00,000/- Before High Court 20,00,000/- Before Supreme Court 25,00,000/- It is clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case."

"10:- This instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in High Courts/ Tribunals. Pending appeals below the specified tax limits in para 3 above may be withdrawn/not pressed. Appeals before the Supreme Court will be governed by the instructions on this subject, operative at the time when such appeal was filed."

In the present case, the tax effect is Rs.3.82 lakhs as mentioned in paragraph-10 of the Appeal Memo. In view of the above, Mr. Suresh Kumar learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue does not press the present Appeal.

Accordingly, Appeal dismissed, as not pressed. Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules.

Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules.

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J)