Rajesh Trilokchand Chopra v. Jayesh Vinod Tanna And 7 ORS

1/2 903.EXA-1497-2018.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY AND ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.1497 OF 2018 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.620 OF 2018 WITH NOTICE NO.244 OF 2018 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.1497 OF 2018 IN SUIT NO.8 OF 2014 Rajesh Trilokchand Chopra ....Plaintiff Vs.

Jayesh Vinod Tanna and Ors. ....Defendants ---- Mr. Nishant Sasidharan a/w. Mr. Kalpesh Mehta, Ms. Urvi Tanna and Ms. Prachi Badani I/b. Pravin Mehta and Mithi and Company for plaintiff. Mr. Rajesh T. Chopra, plaintiff present in person. Mr. Rajiv Narula a/w. Ms. Ekta Pandav I/b. Jhangiani, Narual and Associates for respondent nos.1,2 and 3.

Ms. Deepa Bisht I/b. Mr. Tushar Garodia for respondent nos.6 to 8. Ms. Heena Tanna, defendant no.2 present in person. Mr. Vivek Tanna, defendant no.3 present in person. Ms. Ramila P. Chopra, defendant no.6 present in person. Mr. Santosh R. Chopra, defendant no.7 present in person. Ms. Pushpa T. Chopra, defendant no.8 present in person. ---- CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J.

DATE : 8th MARCH 2019 P.C.:

At the outset, Mr. Sasidharan, counsel for plaintiff seeks leave to withdraw the execution application as against defendant nos.4 and 5. Execution application dismissed as withdrawn as against defendant nos.4 and 5.

Gauri Gaekwad

2/2 903.EXA-1497-2018.doc Plaintiff and remaining defendants, viz., defendant nos.1,2,3,6,7 and 8 have entered into consent adjustment of the decree dated 2nd March 2019. The same is taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The counsel state that plaintiff and defendant nos.1,2,3,6,7 and 8 are present in Court and identify them. Order in terms of the consent adjustment of the decree. All undertakings accepted. Decree accordingly stands satisfied. Liberty to apply. All interim applications stand disposed. All interim orders also stand vacated.

(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Gauri Gaekwad