Parle Golbal Technologies Pvt Ltd. v. Anthony Magnose Thambiraj

sg arbpl544-19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.544 OF 2019 Parle Global Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

....Petitioner vs Mr. Anthony Magnose Thambiraj

...Respondent

.....

Mr. Prakash Vyas, a/w. Mr. Ganesh Ambrekar, i/b. M/s. Thakore Jariwala & Associates, for the Petitioner.

Ms. Shaba N. Khan, i/b. Govilkar & Associates LLP, for the Respondent. ......

CORAM : G.S. KULKARNI, J.

DATED: 13 JUNE 2019 P.C.:

.

Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned advocate for the respondent states that she would file vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent within two weeks from today.

2.

This is an application under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 made by the petitioner praying for extension of the mandate of the arbitral tribunal to conclude the arbitral proceeding and publish an award. The petitioner has made averments that the dispute between the parties is in fact settled and consent terms between the parties are also now finalised. It is stated that, to place the consent terms before the arbitral tribunal for an award in terms of the consent terms, the mandate of the arbitral tribunal is required to be extended.

Pg 1 of 2

sg arbpl544-19.doc 3.

Having perused the averments made in the petition and having heard the learned counsel for the parties, it is in the interest of justice, that the mandate of the arbitral tribunal be extended for a period of six months from today. Ordered accordingly. All contentions of the parties on merits of the matter are expressly kept open. 4.

The petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs. ( G.S. KULKARNI, J. ) Pg 2 of 2