Mohd. Yaseen Hashmi v. Tata Motors Finance Ltd And ANR

902-arbpl30-16 vai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO.30 OF 2016 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1507 OF 2016 AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1512 OF 2016 IN ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO.30 OF 2016 Mohd.Yaseen Hashmi

...Petitioner

V/s.

Tata Motors Finance Ltd.

...Respondent

Ms.Priyanka Patkar i/b Mr.Yogendra Pendse for the Petitioner / Applicant.

Mr.Vishal Kanade i/b Wadia Ghandy & Co. for the Respondent No.1. CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J.

DATE : 16TH MARCH, 2018.

P.C. :- 1.

Mr.Kanade, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.1 tenders the consent terms filed by the parties before the Executing Court in Regular Darkhasta No.562 of 2015. It is clear that the petitioner has thus accepted the impugned award rendered by the learned arbitrator. In view of the consent terms arrived at between the parties, the Arbitration Petition (Lodging) No.30 of 2016 does not survive and is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. 1/2

902-arbpl30-16 2.

In view of dismissal of the arbitration petition, Notices of Motion Nos.1507 of 2016 and 1512 of 2016 do not survive and are accordingly dismissed.

(R.D. DHANUKA, J.) 2/2