Shimnit Utsc India And ANR. v. The State Of Maharashtra And 2 ORS.

907-WP.2390.2014.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2390 OF 2014 Shimnit Utsch India Pvt. Ltd.} and Anr.

} Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra } and Ors.

} Respondents Mr. Ashish Kamat with Mr. Abhay Jadeja and Mr. Varun Satiya i/b. M/s. Crawford Bayley and Co. for the petitioners.

Mr. B. B. Sharma - AGP for respondent nos. 1 and 2.

Mr. Y. R. Mishra with Ms. Purnima Awasthi for respondent no. 3.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.

DATED :- JULY 22, 2016 P.C. :- When this petition was called out, Mr. Sharma learned AGP appearing for the State, on instructions, submits that the impugned request or proposal has since been withdrawn and by the State. Once that is withdrawn, then, we need not examine any academic challenge, which is raised on the conditions in this proposal. The writ petition, therefore, does not survive and is dismissed as infructuous.

(DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) J.V.Salunke,PA