The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 11, Mumbai v. Dr. Renu B. Hinduja

638-08-itxa=.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 638 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax-11 .. Appellant v/s.

Dr. Renu B. Hinduja .. Respondent None for the appellant Ms. Neelam Jadhav for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.J.

DATED : 19th JANUARY, 2016.

P.C.

1.

This appeal relates to Assessment Year 1994-95. None appears in support of the appeal. It appears that the Revenue is not interested in pursuing this appeal. Moreover, we notice that in para 10 of the Appeal Memo, the tax effect involved is Rs. 9.50 lakhs. Therefore, in view of the Central Board of Direct Tax Circular No.21/15 dated 10th December, 2015, the Revenue it seems is not interested in pursuing this appeal.

2.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. (B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) Uday S. Jagtap