The Commissioner Of Central Excise , Thane Ii , Commissionerate v. M/S Jsw Steel Ltd.

(3)-CEXA-68-13.doc.

Balaji G.

Panchal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Balaji G. Panchal Date: 2020.12.17 10:58:46 +0530 CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO.68 OF 2013 Commissioner of Central Excise ..Appellant

Versus

M/s. JSW Steel Ltd.

..Respondent Mr. Sham Walve, Advocate for the Appellant.

Mr. Kiran Chavan i/by Cenex Services, for the Respondent. CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.

DATE : 16th DECEMBER, 2020 P.C.

1.

Heard Mr. Sham Walve, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Kiran Chavan, learned counsel for the respondent. 2.

This appeal has been preferred under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated 11.10.2011 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal Bench, Mumbai in Appeal No.E/930/2008-Mum..

3.

The appeal was admitted by this Court on 27.03.2014. 4.

The appeal is listed today on praecipe filed by learned counsel for the appellant.

5.

Mr. Sham Walve, learned counsel for the appellant fairly submits that as per instructions of the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, Government of India dated 22.08.2019 monetary limit for filing/ BGP.

(3)-CEXA-68-13.doc.

pursuing appeals by the department before the High Courts has been enhanced to Rs.1,00,00,000/-. In the present appeal amount of duty involved is Rs.71.91 lakhs. Therefore, prayer is made for withdrawal of the appeal.

6.

Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection. 7.

In view of the above, appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. 8.

Refund as per rules.

9.

this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a ABHAY AHUJA, J UJJAL BHUYAN, J BGP.