← Library
Bombay High CourtCOMAP/55/2021disposed off

Anupama Agarwal And 4 ORS. v. Il And Fs Financial Services Limited

2023-01-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.R. Shriram,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil2 pages

1/2 31-COMAP-55-2021.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PURTI PRASAD PARAB COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 55 OF 2021 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 21 OF 2019 PURTI PRASAD PARAB Date: 2023.01.13 14:38:57 +0530 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 23727 OF 2021 IN COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 55 OF 2021 Anupama Agarwal and Ors.

....Appellants V/s.

IL and FS Financial Services Limited

...Respondents

---- Mr. Amrut Joshi a/w Ms. Leona Furtado and Mr. Abhishek Thole for Appellants.

Dr. Birendra Saraf, Senior Advocate a/w Ms. Ankita Agrawal and Mr. Gaurav Suryavanshi i/b DSK Legal for Respondent.

---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATED : 9th JANUARY 2023 P.C. :

1.

This is an appeal impugning conditional leave to defend being granted to appellant who are defendant in the summary proceedings. Mr.Joshi in fairness as an officer of the court states that this court in Skill Himachal Infrastructure & Tourism Ltd. And Ors. Vs. IL & FS Financial Services Ltd.1 has held that an appeal from an order granting conditional leave to defend in a Summons for Judgment in a Commercial Summary Suit is not maintainable in view of Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act. Mr.Joshi in fairness also states that here also conditional leave to defend for 1 2022 SCC OnLine Bom 3152 Purti Parab

2/2 31-COMAP-55-2021.doc Summons for Judgment in Commercial Suit has been granted. Therefore, this appeal will not be maintainable.

2.

Appeal dismissed.

3.

We clarify that appellant is at liberty to take such steps as required in accordance with rules.

4.

Dr. Saraf for respondent states that in any event appeal will not be maintainable since in the order dated 20th August 2020, copy whereof is at Exhibit "B" to the appeal memo, appellants had agreed to deposit the amount which has been directed to be deposited vide impugned order. 5.

Consequently, Interim Application also stands dismissed. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Purti Parab