← Library
Bombay High CourtEXA/992/2012dismissed

Kotak Mahindra Bank v. Ramanarayan Chograsia Mehendra

2019-10-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla9 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 990 OF 2012 The Punjab and Maharashtra Co-operative Bank Ltd.

M/s. Atharva Engineers (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Respondents EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 991 OF 2012 M/s. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ketan Pravin Chauhan EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 992 OF 2012 Ramanarayan Chograsia Mehendra EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 993 OF 2012 Jitendra Kumar Yadav EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 994 OF 2012 Shaikh Janid Ahmed EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 995 OF 2012 1/9

Suresh K. Seth EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 996 OF 2012 M/s. Kotak Mahindra Bank Yogesh Karsandas Shah EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 999 OF 2012 M/s. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ramesh Dharamshi Sandha EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1000 OF 2012 M/s. Kotak Mahindra Bank Manila Zaveri EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1001 OF 2012 M/s. Kotak Mahindra Bank Arvind Mulji Malde EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1002 OF 2012 M/s. Kotak Mahindra Bank Nilesh P. Kasale 2/9

EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1003 OF 2012 M/s. Kotak Mahindra Bank sanatan Shyamdev Prajapati EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1004 OF 2012 M/s. Kotak Mahindra Bank Bharat Budharam Bhatt EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1006 OF 2012 M/s. Kotak Mahindra Bank Omprakash Radhakishan Chavda EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1007 OF 2012 Masoom Akhtar Manwar Shaikh EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1008 OF 2012 Aslami Antulay EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1009 OF 2012 Dinesh Gangji Nagda 3/9

EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1010 OF 2012 SK Tousif Ahmad EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1011 OF 2012 Virendra Prakash Nimje EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1012 OF 2012 Mukesh Babubhai Shah EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1013 OF 2012 M/s. Kotak Mahindra Bank Firoz Mhod. Shaikh EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1014 OF 2012 Nazim Hussain Kondkari EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1015 OF 2012 S.Y. Avhad 4/9

EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1016 OF 2012 Kshitiz Anil Saigal EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1017 OF 2012 Mohammed Husain Khan EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1018 OF 2012 Sandip Narayan Jadhav EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1019 OF 2012 Trupti M. Bowlekar EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1020 OF 2012 Nazir Ahmed Ansari EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1021 OF 2012 Ashish Bamba 5/9

EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1022 OF 2012 Vipul D. Minawala K. Ramesh Rao EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1027 OF 2012 G. Sagarmal Bihani Shrenik Shah EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1030 OF 2012 Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd.

Manish Kiran Adatiya & Anr.

Respondents EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1035 OF 2012 M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd.

Saleem Ahmed Shaikh EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1039 OF 2012 Zakir Hafeez Khan EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1040 OF 2012 Dipen Mukesh Mehta 6/9

EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1041 OF 2012 Hemant Babu Madukar EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1042 OF 2012 Mahendra Naginlal Vaidya EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1043 OF 2012 Prakash S. Sarma EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1044 OF 2012 Ajit T. Vettakal EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1045 OF 2012 Vashdev Vasandram Ghind EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1046 OF 2012 Jiril Abraham 7/9

EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1047 OF 2012 Pradeep M. Chaurasia EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1048 OF 2012 Chetan Laxmikant Tanna EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1049 OF 2012 Uday H. Desai EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1050 OF 2012 Reema Mohan Girap EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1051 OF 2012 Sunil Narhari Dave EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1052 OF 2012 Abrar Hussain Ashraf H. Shaikh 8/9

EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1055 OF 2012 M/s. Ajaydeep Const. Pvt. Ltd.

M.S.R.D.C.

EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1056 OF 2012 M/s. Ajaydeep Const. Pvt. Ltd.

M.S.R.D.C.

None for the Parties.

CORAM :

R.I. CHAGLA, J.

DATED :

11th OCTOBER, 2019.

P.C. :

These Execution Applications have not been proceeded with for a period of over 12 months from the date of filing of these applications and have been placed by the Prothonotary and Senior Master under Rule 329 of the Bombay High Court Original Side Rules before this Court for dismissal for want of prosecution. As none appears for the Applicants, the Execution Applications are dismissed with no order as to costs. (R.I. CHAGLA, J.) 9/9